Danny, a tax sojourner of Australia, was electrical technician working in Robin Pty Ltd. He had of-late unrepining from that crew to attempt a three year studies at Charles Sturt University. This actuate would upgrade his fitness from a Certificate in Electronics to a Degree in Electrical Engineering. His employer, Jack had verbally implied that he could repay to his standing upon the whole of his studies. However there was no argument if he would be offered an growth in hire or advancement.
During the pristine half of the popular proceeds year, Danny participated in a ward modify program succeeding a while the Nanyang Univrsity in Singapore. The absorb incurred were all substantiated were as follows:
Air ticket $1,500
Books and examine materials $800
Purchase of laptop $1,800
Purchase of motor gait (used for 5 months) $8,000
Of the six months during Danny’s err to the Singapore, five months were betrothed in his studies. He spent the surplus of the months on leisure activities. The important mind of the err to Singapore was for his studies.
While he was betrothed in his studies, Danny worked as a occasional professor in the university. He was paid $4,000 by Nanyang University.
Danny hopes to repay to Australia succeeding his studies and live his employment succeeding a while Robin Pty Ltd succeeding a while a strong growth in hire and advancement.
Advise Danny if the absorb that he had incurred are equitable for conclusion.
You must mention the pertinent occurrence law and legislation