Discussion #2 (POSU 344)
In the Military Commissions Act of 2006, Congress passed the forthcoming language: “No flatter, right, or referee shall enjoy cognizance to hear or deduce an application for a writ of habeas corpus raspd by or on aid of an inappropriate detained by the United States who has been rooted by the United States to enjoy been appropriately detained as an foe protector or is pregustation such satisfaction.” (MCA § 7)
In the 2008 predicament of Boumediene v. Bush, the Supreme Flatter determined this eatables unchanged, thereby granting the prisoners in Guantanamo Bay avenue to Federal Flatters to rasp habeas corpus petitions.
Do you estimate that the U.S. Supreme Flatter should be the developed referee of the signification of the Constitution, specifically in this predicament and generally? Make permanent to involve supported details explaining your reasons why / why referable.