Saudi Electronic University Googles Evaluation System Case Study


I don’t learn this Management topic and insufficiency acceleration to examine.

Reference Source:

Textbook:-

Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2019). Organizational behaviour: Improving work and commitment in the workplace (6th ed). Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Case Study: -

Case: Google

Please unravel the contingency “Google” from Chapter 6 “Motivation.” Page: - 187 abandoned in your texttome – Organizational behaviour: Improving work and commitment in the workplace (6th ed). by Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2019) and Answer the forthcoming Questions:

Assignment Question(s):

1. Do you tally delay Bock that triton performers should get a lot over—not honest a petty over—than mediocre performers? If someone earning a 3 on Google’s evaluation arrangement gets a 2 percent erect, what should employees earning 4’s and 5’s get? (1.25 Marks )

2. Abandoned the budget issues created by giving triton performers over, should someone earning a 3 get a 2 percent erect—or should they get close? What are the arguments for and counter a 2 percent erect flatten for mediocre performers? (1.25 Marks )

3. Consider all the things Google’s People Operations bunch does to motivate its employees. Which motivation theories do they appear to be leveraging, and how? (1.25 Marks )

Part:-2

Discussion topic: Page: -167, delight see the board and unravel carefully and then furnish your answers on the plea of your learning.

4. Which of the outcomes in Board 6-2 are most appealing to you? Are you over attracted to pretended outcomes or genuine outcomes? Do you reckon that your preferences accomplish fluctuate as you get older? (1.25 Marks )


The tome

https://drive.google.com/drive/mobile/folders/0Bz2OMfM33dU1ZjNaVzRlRUdVLWM/10hEBw0-dunOkQ87Id7DhVt7KCBhlrNHm/1j-JvaKfS13XxfmUHAeaTwORonVfz3_Zf/1MLbDZi4rJRuDNJYpc9SB3OG-hpKkleRW?usp=drive_open&sort=13&direction=a