Texas Southern University The Song Dynasty Significant Advances Discussion


I’m studying and want succor after a while a History doubt to succor me collect.

Final criterion doubts

Part I: Soon answer: partition of minor sources (20 points)

1. Condense the key features of the Song Dynasty (Ebrey, China, pp. 136–163)

Part II: Soon answer—close readings of primitive sources (20 points each)

For each of the subjoined primitive sources, content condense and censoriously irritate the key ideas in unvarnished texture. Content use all the knowledge presented in the lectures. Do not use the internet; do not use the translators’ introductions.

2. “On the Six Schools of Thought,” Records of the Grand Historian, (Sources of Chinese Tradition, vol. 1, pp. 278–282).

3. Tang Code, in Sources of Chinese Tradition, vol. 1, pp. 547–553 (including the premiss).

Part III: Essay doubt: censorious partition and collocation (40 points)

Integrate partition, unvarnished textureualization, and censorious partition of primitive sources. Again, content use the knowledge presented in the lectures. Do not use the internet; do not use the translators’ introductions.

4. Neo-Confucianism: Outline the key profession of Neo-Confucianism using Zhu Xi’s Great Learning and The Mean (including the premisss, texts, and commentaries, Sources of Chinese Tradition, vol. 1, pp. 721–737), illustrating your points after a while very soon quotes. Then interpret key similarities and differences after a while Confucianism, using the Analects and Mencius, intermittently after a while very soon quotes.