HC 466 Herzing University Online Week 2 Training Manual for Leaders Discussion


Help me con-over for my Health & Medical tabulate. I’m heap and don’t learn.

Unit 2 Assignment - Luxuriance Manual

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 100
  • Submitting a quotation minute box, a website url, a media recording, or a refine upload

Individuals behove chiefs through luxuriance and outgrowth of skills as well-behaved-behaved as trial. In this assessment, beget a luxuriance manual that helps to teach strategic artfulnessning and start skills to men-folks in a start role.

Instructions

  • Revisit the Unit 1 Assessment to foreclosure the following:
    • The negotiative trial summarized. Consider the chief(s) that was in enjoin during the artfulnessning and implementation of that diversify.
    • The start skills that were presented by the chief throughout the diversify system.
    • The challenges and recommendations for a strategic artfulness to lenify those challenges in the Unit 1 Assessment.
  • From a manager’s perspective, beget a luxuriance manual for the chief(s) standpointed on strategic artfulnessning that addresses the following:
    • Define and teach the end of strategic artfulnessning.
    • Explain the role of the chief in the form (this should be particular to the issue supposing in Unit 1).
    • Describe at meanest 3 start qualities that assist to prosperous strategic artfulnessning.
    • Describe how the chief(s) should approximation situations for optimal results, using at meanest 1 prosperous and 1 challenging issue to represent.
    • Include a appellation page, table of solution, allusion page.
  • Complete appended scrutiny on this subject as indispensable, including at meanest 2 allusions, formatted APA title.

Estimated date to complete: 3 hours

Rubric

HC466 - Unit 2 Assignment - Luxuriance Manual

HC466 - Unit 2 Assignment - Luxuriance Manual

CriteriaRatingsPts

This standard is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

40.0 pts

Level 5

Demonstrates the force to form a apparent and insightful completion declaration/topic declaration/subject declaration after a while token of all appropriate contextual factors.

36.0 pts

Level 4

Demonstrates the force to form a completion declaration, topic declaration/subject declaration after a while token of most appropriate contextual factors, and completion declaration is adequately minute.

32.0 pts

Level 3

Begins to teach the force to form a completion declaration/topic declaration/subject declaration after a while token of most appropriate contextual factors, but completion declaration is shallow.

28.0 pts

Level 2

Demonstrates a scant force in identifying a completion declaration/topic declaration/subject declaration or cognate contextual factors.

24.0 pts

Level 1

Demonstrates the force to teach contextual factors but does not afford a defined declaration.

0.0 pts

Level 0

There is no token of a defined declaration.

40.0 pts

This standard is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P

40.0 pts

Level 5

Organizes and compares token to unearth insightful patterns, differences, or similarities cognate to standpoint.

36.0 pts

Level 4

Organizes and interprets token to unearth patterns, differences, or similarities cognate to standpoint.

32.0 pts

Level 3

Organizes and describes token according to patterns, differences, or similarities cognate to standpoint.

28.0 pts

Level 2

Organizes token, but the form is not conducive in unearthing patterns, differences, or similarities.

24.0 pts

Level 1

Describes token, but it is not arranged and/or is uncognate to standpoint.

0.0 pts

Level 0

Lists token, but it is not arranged and/or is uncognate to standpoint.

40.0 pts

This standard is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

10.0 pts

Level 5

The article exhibits an justifiable charge of written English accents conventions. The article has no errors in mechanics, rhetoric, or spelling.

9.0 pts

Level 4

The article exhibits a good-natured-natured charge of written English accents conventions. The article has no errors in mechanics or spelling after a while younger actual errors that lessen the course of message.

8.0 pts

Level 3

The article exhibits a basic charge of written English accents conventions. The article has younger errors in mechanics, rhetoric, or spelling that impression the course of message.

7.0 pts

Level 2

The article exhibits a scant charge of written English accents conventions. The article has continual errors in mechanics, rhetoric, or spelling that obstruct the course of message.

6.0 pts

Level 1

The article exhibits inconsiderable charge of written English accents conventions. The article has errors in mechanics, rhetoric, or spelling that action the reader to bung and reread faculty of the adaptation to distinguish purport.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The article does not teach charge of written English accents conventions. The article has multiple errors in mechanics, rhetoric, or spelling that action the reader inaptitude in distinguishing the purport.

10.0 pts

This standard is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I

10.0 pts

Level 5

The required APA elements are all interposed after a while emend formatting, including in-quotation citations and allusions.

9.0 pts

Level 4

The required APA elements are all interposed after a while younger formatting errors, including in-quotation citations and allusions.

8.0 pts

Level 3

The required APA elements are all interposed after a while multiple formatting errors, including in-quotation citations and allusions.

7.0 pts

Level 2

The required APA elements are not all interposed and/or there are elder formatting errors, including in-quotation citations and allusions.

6.0 pts

Level 1

Several APA elements are dropping. The errors in formatting teach a scant learning of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and allusions.

0.0 pts

Level 0

There is inconsiderable to no token of APA formatting and/or there are no in-quotation citations and/or allusions.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

PreviousNext